7 Questions to Answer Before Your First HR Software Demo
Most teams walk into demos with a clear problem and walk out excited about features that don't solve it. Here's what to clarify first.
Most teams don't switch HR systems because they want to learn how to run payroll in a new system. They switch because something specific stopped working — or was never there to begin with.
The problem is usually clear at the beginning. Then demos happen.
Teams walk into demos with a clear problem, then walk out excited about features that don't actually solve it. By the time they present a recommendation to leadership, the original driver has been diluted or quietly replaced.
When the system goes live and that core issue still exists — or turns out not to be supported — it looks like the team missed something, even if they didn't.
This guide covers seven questions to answer before your first demo — questions that protect your original reason for switching and help you evaluate systems based on where your organization actually is, not where you hope it will be.
1. What are our real priorities right now and which ones are non-negotiable?
Most teams switch because something specific stopped working — or was never there to begin with.
Maybe it's:
- needing accurate reporting across multiple entities
- lack of visibility for leadership
- broken approval flows
- inconsistent data across teams
That reason is usually clear at the beginning.
Then demos happen, and suddenly the conversation shifts:
- the org chart looks great
- the employee profile is cleaner
- the UX feels modern
None of that is bad — but it's rarely the reason the switch started.
The truth / what to look out for
The risk is subtle. Teams walk into demos with a clear problem, then walk out excited about features that don't actually solve it.
By the time they present a recommendation to leadership or their team, the original driver has been diluted or quietly replaced. When the system goes live and that core issue still exists — or turns out not to be supported — it looks like the team missed something, even if they didn't.
Write this down before demos
Before demos, write this down in one sentence:
We are switching because we need ______, and if the new system doesn't do that, it's not a win.
That sentence should survive every demo, every comparison doc, and every leadership update.
If it starts disappearing, that's not excitement. That's drift.
2. What do we expect to be meaningfully better after the switch?
Once you've protected the reason for switching, the next question is simpler — and harder:
What should actually improve?
Not features. Not screenshots. Not what looks impressive in a demo.
Real improvements tend to fall into a few categories:
- fewer manual steps
- clearer ownership and approvals
- more reliable data
- better visibility for leaders
- less follow-up and rework
The truth / what to look out for
This matters because many systems can technically support the same workflows. What differs is how much effort it takes to get there — and what breaks under real usage.
If you can't describe what should feel easier, faster, or more reliable after go-live, demos will fill in that blank for you.
And when success is defined by polish instead of outcomes, disappointment is almost guaranteed — even if the software is capable.
3. Where is our organization actually right now?
It's easy to evaluate systems based on where you want to be. It's much harder — and more important — to evaluate them based on where you are.
A few honest questions help here:
- Are our processes mostly standardized, or still evolving?
- Do we have time to configure and maintain complexity — or are we already stretched?
- When something changes, do we update systems quickly, or work around them?
- How much change fatigue exists right now?
The truth / what to look out for
These answers matter more than roadmap promises.
Buying for a future version of the organization assumes stable ownership, available time, and consistent priorities. Most teams don't have all three at once.
When the system arrives before the organization is ready, it doesn't feel "powerful." It feels heavy.
4. Who needs to be involved in demos — and who will live with the system after go-live?
Implementation success usually breaks down before contracts are signed, not after.
That happens when:
- the people choosing the system aren't the ones using it day to day
- key stakeholders only see the system once it's already selected
- assumptions get made about what the system "will handle"
Demos shape expectations. If the wrong people are missing, or the wrong people dominate, those expectations drift.
Before demos, be explicit about:
- who will configure and maintain the system
- who will rely on it to do their job
- who needs visibility into outcomes, not features
The truth / what to look out for
Not everyone needs a vote, but the people who will:
- answer questions
- explain limitations
- own workarounds
…need to understand what's being bought.
When stakeholders meet the system for the first time at go-live, frustration isn't a change-management issue — it's a selection issue.
5. Are we using software to avoid making hard decisions about how we operate?
This question is uncomfortable, and that's the point.
Many HR system switches start with a real problem, but they also carry a quieter hope: that the new platform will somehow settle things we haven't fully agreed on.
Things like:
- how approvals should actually work
- which policies are flexible vs enforced
- what "standard" really means across teams or entities
The truth / what to look out for
When processes live in spreadsheets or inboxes, ambiguity can survive. Once they live in software, it can't.
Every system forces decisions:
- who can do what
- what happens by default
- what's allowed vs blocked
If those decisions haven't been made intentionally, the system will make them for you — often in ways that feel arbitrary or restrictive later.
That's when teams say the software is "too rigid" or "not built for us," when in reality it's exposing choices that were never fully resolved.
Before demos, ask yourself honestly: Are we looking for a platform to support how we operate, or hoping it will decide for us?
6. What type of HR platform actually fits our organization today?
By this point, the question isn't "Which vendor do we like?" It's "What kind of system can we realistically support?"
Most HR platforms fall somewhere on a spectrum:
- highly structured and opinionated
- highly flexible and configurable
Neither is inherently better. The right choice depends on how your organization actually operates right now.
More structured systems work best when:
- processes are already standardized
- there's clarity on policies and approvals
- the goal is consistency and control
More flexible systems make sense when:
- workflows vary by team or entity
- policies are still evolving
- the organization needs room to adapt
The truth / what to look out for
The mistake teams make is choosing based on aspiration. A system designed for tight standardization will feel constraining in an organization that's still figuring things out. A highly flexible system will feel overwhelming if no one has time to maintain it.
Fit matters more than feature count.
The best platform isn't the one that can do the most — it's the one that matches how much structure, ownership, and ongoing effort your organization can actually sustain.
7. How much time and internal effort can we realistically dedicate?
Most HR software decisions focus on price and features. Very few account for the internal work required to make the system succeed.
Every implementation requires:
- time to clean and validate data
- training for admins and end users
- testing workflows and edge cases
- ongoing questions once the system is live
That work doesn't disappear after go-live. It shifts.
For a period of time, someone will be:
- answering "how do I…?" questions
- updating configurations
- explaining why something works the way it does
The truth / what to look out for
When teams underestimate this effort, the system gets blamed for problems that are really about capacity.
That's how "bad software" stories are born — not because the platform was wrong, but because the organization didn't have the time or bandwidth to support it.
Before demos, be honest about:
- how much time your team can realistically dedicate
- whether that time is temporary or ongoing
- what other priorities will compete for attention
A system that fits your capacity will feel supportive. One that doesn't will feel heavy — no matter how powerful it is.
Final Takeaway: The Best Demos Start Before the Call
The best vendor demos aren't the ones with the slickest presentation. They're the ones where you already know what you're looking for — and what would disqualify a system before it's too late.
When your core requirements survive every demo and comparison doc, you're not just buying software. You're solving the problem you started with.
And that's the only reason to switch in the first place.
For more on what needs to be decided before implementation begins, see: What Needs to Be Decided Before HR Software Implementation Begins.